Question: Do Libs want a Government according to our constitution, or do they want an "Overprotective Parent"? Just a small portion of current and/or proposed laws courtesy of our friends on the left:
NY - proposed law to make salt in restaurant dishes illegal.
NY - proposed law to make trans fats illegal.
The Montana legislature may ban the use of aluminum bats at baseball games.
New Jersey may ban anyone under 21 from owning a credit card.
Illegal to ride a motorcycle without Helmet
Illegal to ride a bike without a helmet
Illegal to smoke a legal product in public parks
California and Illinois want to prohibit teens from using tanning beds
Checking ID's for minors at cyber cafe's
Colorado is considering designating a state-sponsored "No Name-Calling Week."
Only in SF - "Backyard Dog Law" Must have a "non-tipping" water bowl
the federal government has now advised that children’s books published before 1985 should not be considered safe and may in many cases be unlawful to sell or distribute
Daycare laws: food programs to limit sugary sweets and drinks, prohibit deep-fat frying, mandate servings of vegetables and limit TV, computer and video-game use to one hour per day, among other regulations.
Baggy pants that show boxer shorts or thongs would be illegal under a proposed amendment to Atlanta’s indecency laws.
Do you need a government policy to remind you that McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s and Hardees are not health food stores
What I can do in my own house
Control the temperature in my house.
Control they type of Health Ins I have
There's a difference between passing laws the protect others, and laws that take the place of good parenting.
Can you not see that?
Answer: They don't want an overprotective parent... they want to BE an overprotective parent.
Bear in mind how many liberal politicians have that "You're so dumb; I REALLY know what's best for you" tone in their voices.
